Gaza: Collapse of War-Damaged Residential Building Exposes Continuing Risks to Civilians
The fatal collapse of a residential building on 16 September in Gaza City—killing at least 21 Palestinians, including 11 children and five women, and injuring 14 others—exposes the horrific, prolonged toll of Israeli military strikes on vulnerable civilians.
Sustaining prior damage from Israeli attacks, the structure sheltered displaced families left with no safe alternative. This disaster stands as a brutal testament to the ongoing dangers inflicted by systematic Israeli targeting, structural destruction, and severe Israeli restrictions on rescue equipment, representing a grave violation of civilian protection and international humanitarian law.
Background
The collapsed building sheltered roughly six displaced Palestinian families forced to reside there despite known structural risks due to a severe lack of safe housing. Rescue workers and residents searched through the rubble by hand owing to critical shortages of heavy machinery and fuel.
This incident highlights a broader shelter crisis across Gaza. Humanitarian assessments indicate that of nearly 178,000 evaluated housing units, 60% are destroyed, severely damaged, or uninhabitable. Israeli restrictions affecting the entry of timber, tools, and shelter materials continue to impede essential repairs, leaving humanitarian and rescue agencies with severe equipment shortages that hinder rubble clearance and emergency response.
Since October 2023, extensive damage to housing and civilian infrastructure, coupled with repeated displacement, has left most residents in overcrowded camps, substandard tents, or unsafe structures, alongside widespread shortages of food, water, medicine, and basic shelter.
Institutional Position
Institutional Position
The right to life and the obligation to protect civilians do not end when active hostilities cease. When military operations leave residential buildings severely damaged and unsafe, parties responsible must take effective measures to mitigate foreseeable risks to civilian life.
The Gaza City building collapse illustrates the consequences of leaving civilians with no viable alternative to occupying unsafe structures. Widespread housing destruction, prolonged displacement, inadequate shelter, limited rescue capacity, and barriers to reconstruction can transform earlier damage into an ongoing threat to civilian lives.
International humanitarian law requires parties to distinguish between civilians and military objectives and to take all feasible precautions to minimize civilian harm. These obligations extend to addressing known and foreseeable dangers arising from damaged civilian infrastructure. The reported circumstances therefore raise serious questions about whether sufficient measures have been taken to protect civilians and enable effective rescue and humanitarian operations.
Applicable Legal Framework
International humanitarian law (IHL)—including the Fourth Geneva Convention and the principles of distinction, proportionality, and precaution—prohibits attacks on civilians and civilian objects. Concurrently, international human rights law (Article 6 ICCPR) mandates that states take reasonable measures within their control to protect life against foreseeable threats. Evaluating the collapse therefore requires assessing both the initial structural damage and subsequent measures to protect exposed civilians. Furthermore, restrictions on entering rescue equipment, shelter, or construction supplies must be scrutinized for necessity, proportionality, and compliance with IHL obligations regarding essential humanitarian assistance.
Demands Aligned with International Human Rights Principles
|
Demand |
Relevant International Human Rights Standard |
|
Israeli authorities must permit immediate entry of heavy equipment, fuel, and shelter supplies for rescue and structural safety. |
International humanitarian law requires parties to facilitate and allow humanitarian relief for civilians in need, subject to applicable security requirements. |
|
Israeli authorities should ensure all attacks comply with distinction, proportionality, and precaution, protecting civilian buildings. |
Geneva Convention IV and customary international humanitarian law governing the protection of civilians and civilian objects. |
|
Relevant authorities in Gaza should identify unstable buildings, evacuate residents, and provide safe temporary shelter. |
The right to life under ICCPR Article 6 and the obligation to protect civilians from foreseeable risks. |
|
Humanitarian and civil-defence agencies should be granted safe, sustained, and unhindered access to affected areas to conduct rescue, recovery, structural assessment, and emergency shelter operations. |
International humanitarian law governing humanitarian relief and the protection of civilians. |
|
Competent and independent authorities should investigate the collapse and prior contributing attacks/restrictions to ensure accountability and remedies. |
The right to an effective remedy and the obligation to investigate potentially unlawful deprivation of life. |
|
|
|
Civilian protection extends beyond the immediate moment of attack to encompass hazards caused by destroyed homes, unstable structures, displacement, and lack of safe shelter. Preventable deaths from prolonged exposure to these risks must not become an accepted norm of warfare. Ensuring meaningful protection demands strict compliance with international law, unhindered humanitarian access, and complete accountability for unlawful conduct.
Women Journalists Without Chains
Geneva, Switzerland - September 18, 2026


En
Ar